19 Oct 09, 01:57 JLam: you, sir, are scary. |
15 Oct 09, 21:01 JChua: You don't want to wait until PAP starts doing 'what it wants' before shouting for help. |
15 Oct 09, 11:05 P{ZM}: Okay, accepted... But there is still a difference in saying that it "does what it wants" vs "can / potentially will do what it wants" |
15 Oct 09, 01:46 JChua: I don't think I'll be far wrong. It is a very thin line to transit from a government that does what it does 'for our own good' (as claimed in budget 09), to a government that does what it wants. |
13 Oct 09, 21:56 P{ZM}: Your comments are even more extreme than freedomhouse's.. Its not that bad la =p |
22 Aug 09, 00:15 Lunaray: Gosh, forgive all the infantile english errors i made in my comments. I'm so embarrassed >.< |
16 Aug 09, 20:42 JChua: No thanks =) |
8 Aug 09, 23:01 Lunaray: Ever considered law as a profession? |
15 Jun 09, 19:55 JChua: Error on my part. The definition of free-thinker I had in mind was far too narrow; the post just remains as a reminder that my reasoning can be horrendously erroneous. |
13 Jun 09, 16:38 Lunaray: Tell me again what's the difference between being a free-thinker and an agnostic? |
12 Apr 09, 21:59 P{ZM}: Yup, I totally agree with your second line And I haven't found a particular reason to disbelieve it =p |
11 Apr 09, 13:14 JChua: Haha, but that is beside the point, is it? Everything falls into place if Jesus is real. |
9 Apr 09, 22:13 P{ZM}: Ah... You don't work that way with everyday life.. Anyway, even the OT falls into place if Jesus's Divinity is established, so.. well... its not an issue.. |
31 Mar 09, 23:45 JChua: So yes, the only way for me to Believe is to get God himself to come to me. And even then, I'll still cross-examine the possibility of hallucination. I choose Not to Believe, vice versa for you. |
31 Mar 09, 23:43 JChua: Just because we haven't had one does not mean the NT has supernatural origins. It merely points to the lack of information to conduct a scientific inquiry. |
31 Mar 09, 23:41 JChua: Regarding the bible, only the new testament is historically reliable, but I would still vouch for a scientific explanation for the supposed authencity of the NT. |
31 Mar 09, 23:31 JChua: How do you know what God wants? How dare you talk about freedom of choice, when choices are limited and often predetermined by beliefs of our circumstances and upbringing? |
29 Mar 09, 22:16 anon: adios, think this, my friend>>> |
29 Mar 09, 22:15 anon: If that happens could we possibly have the freedom of choice to love Him? God wants us to have freedom, freedom to choose good and to love Him, not be trapped by the belief of fear and logic. |
29 Mar 09, 22:10 anon: Since you don't, I suppose in your mind the only way you will believe if 'God' appears before your eyes? |